Below is a list of the fipa negotiations that have not yet been completed.  From a multilateral perspective, the U.S.-Canada trade agreement has provided a number of political signals, some for future U.S. views on global trade policy: learn more about Canada`s trade and investment agreements: types of treaties and the gradual development of trade and investment agreements. Canada is conducting exploratory discussions on bilateral or multilateral free trade agreements with the following countries and trade blocs, although formal negotiations have not yet begun: Canada`s detailed preparations for the actual negotiations “including the oversight of a special cabinet committee, 15 separate sector advisory groups and a private staff advisory committee” have strengthened the government`s hand on specific negotiating issues. Joe Clark was appointed to the firm`s special commission, which was able to rely on external and internal advice, including by lead negotiator Simon Reisman. The initial aim was to reduce the political pressure on exceptions by putting all subjects at the negotiating table, including cultural issues and investment subsidies. Negotiators on both sides of the table quickly understood what politicians could only point out too quickly: after all, the threatened industries are not only labour-intensive, but also vocally intense. Shortly after Mulroney was elected on September 4, 1984 with the largest parliamentary majority in Canadian history, Mulroney accepted the President`s invitation to bilateral talks in Washington. During these meetings, President Reagan reiterated his 1980 initiative for a free trade area between Canada and the United States and Mexico, which linked the peoples of all North America to a new liberalized trade regime, no matter how vague the details may be. At that time, exhausted by the long 58-day national campaign, and concerned about the need for a new government and cabinet, Mulroney only insisted on a new bilateral process “an annual meeting of presidents and prime ministers and a quarterly meeting of Canadian and American ministers. But are the aforementioned conditions, i.e. the political and personality factors necessary for meaningful change, included in the free trade agreement? These conditions are instructive in this regard. There has been a lot of talk about the personal relationship between Reagan and Mulroney.
It began with the visit to Washington of then-Opposition Leader Brian Mulroney in June 1984, just a week after John Turner, himself a strong pro-American lawyer and former cabinet minister, succeeded the enigmatic Pierre Elliot Trudeau as leader of the Liberal Party. By the spring of 1983, Mulroney had embarked on a strong pro-American platform for the leadership of his own party and for changes on political issues widely imitated by American businesses, namely Trudeau`s policy in the areas of energy, foreign investment, NATO, intellectual Prop-Erty, crown groups and domestic trade. From a personal perspective, Mr. Mulroney was initially lukewarm about global free trade, but was open and critical of bilateral trade restrictions in sectors such as steel, wood, energy and agriculture. The increasing integration between Japanese and American industries, as well as the resulting management and technology links across the Pacific, Japan and Southeast Asia and, finally, China, indicate a radically different environment for multilateral or binational trade agreements.